PMASUP440B - Commission/ recommission plant
Description |
This unit covers the commissioning of new plant/pipeline or the re-commissioning of significantly modified plant/pipeline. This unit does not cover startup of a plant/ pipeline after a shutdown, unless there have been major changes to the plant during the shutdown. For a normal startup use PMAOPS411B Manage plant shutdown and restart. |
Pre Requisites |
Nil |
Application |
In a typical scenario, a new plant/pipeline or a major plant/pipeline upgrade is to be commissioned/recommissioned with a leading plant technician taking a significant role. The technician is involved in the design of the plant/plant modifications and the planning of the startup. Being 'involved in' could mean participating in design meetings or HAZOPS or reviewing/checking the design for operability issues or checking the HAZOP outcomes. This does not preclude the inclusion of 'turnkey' type projects, provided the technician has had a role in the plant design, eg checking operability, suitability for local conditions. This competency includes all equipment associated with the new/modified plant. The technician would not normally have a 'hands on' operating role for all items of equipment, but may have a 'hands on' role for major items of equipment. More importantly, the technician will have an overall role and would be expected to have an understanding of the function of all items of equipment in the plant so that detailed directions can be given plant operators who are performing the 'hands on' role during the commissioning/recommissioning. This competency is typically performed by experienced technicians, likely to be the leaders of an operational team. This may include working in conjunction with a design team, or reviewing final design to ensure plant/ pipeline meets operational requirements and for the purpose of commissioning or recommissioning plant/pipelines. As commissioning is usually a team activity, the technician will take a lead technical role, rather than undertake all aspects on an individual basis. |
Performance Criteria |
1. Contribute to/review the design of plant/ equipment. 1.1. Apply process understanding to the design process 1.2. Identify the role and purpose of the plant and equipment 1.3. Ensure design meets the identified need 1.4. Identify process conditions and apply to hazard and operability studies 1.5. Undertake investigations following hazard studies 1.6. Record and report findings. 2. Take part in commissioning planning. 2.1. Ensure the work is coordinated effectively with others involved on the work site 2.2. Obtain materials necessary to complete the work and check against job requirements 2.3. Obtain tools and equipment necessary to carry out the work and check for correct operation and safety 2.4. Prepare plans to ensure that procedures are performed in the correct sequence 2.5. Obtain approvals where necessary from appropriate authorities. 3. Participate in acceptance of plant/ equipment. 3.1. Undertake pre-commissioning activities 3.2. Complete safety acceptance documentation 3.3. Identify, record and report problems or non-conformance 3.4. Conduct trials/test runs 3.5. Record and report performance data. 4. Commission system. 4.1. Bring the plant/plant systems/pipeline on line 4.2. Make and report adjustments 4.3. Prepare reports in accordance with legislative and company requirements to maintain the historical record. 5. Evaluate results and identify modifications. 5.1. Identify modifications and improvements required 5.2. Check specifications, procedures and training material match the final system/procedures 5.3. Complete documentation and report to appropriate personnel. |
Required Skills & Knowledge |
Required skills
Required knowledge Competence to include the ability to apply and explain:
|
Range Statement |
Appropriate authorities Appropriate authorities may include:
Plant Plant covers on or off shore plant, well heads and also transmission pipelines or similar.
For the purposes of this Training Package, 'procedures' also includes good operating practice as may be defined by industry codes of practice (eg Responsible Care) and government regulations. Recommissioning Recommissioning refers to the start-up of an existing plant following major modifications, rebuild or reconfiguration.
Tools, materials and equipment Tools, materials and equipment may include:
|
Evidence Guide |
Overview of assessment Assessment of this unit should include demonstrated competence on actual plant and equipment in a work environment. The unit will be assessed in as holistic a manner as is practical and may be integrated with the assessment of other relevant units of competency. Simulation may be required to allow for assessment of parts of this unit. It is possible that a simulation will be required to ensure that the technician is competent before taking a significant role in a commissioning activity. Commissioning is an infrequent and often frenetic activity and so it may not be practical or equitable to wait for an actual commissioning to occur to use this as the basis for assessment. Simulation should be based on the actual plant and will include walk-throughs of the relevant competency components. Simulations may also include the use of case studies/ scenarios and role plays. This unit of competency requires a significant body of knowledge which will be assessed through questioning and the use of what-if scenarios both on the plant (during demonstration of normal operations and walk-throughs of abnormal operations) and off the plant. Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit Competence must be demonstrated in the ability to recognise and analyse potential situations requiring action and then in implementing appropriate corrective action. The emphasis should be on the ability to stay out of trouble rather than on recovery from a disaster. Consistent performance should be demonstrated. In particular look to see that:
Context of and specific resources for assessment Assessment will require access to an operating plant over an extended period of time, or a suitable method of gathering evidence of operating ability over a range of situations. A bank of scenarios/case studies/what-ifs will be required as will a bank of questions which will be used to probe the reasoning behind the observable actions. Method of assessment In all plants it may be appropriate to assess this unit concurrently with relevant teamwork and communication units. In a major hazard facility, it may be appropriate to assess this unit concurrently with relevant OHS units. Guidance information for assessment Assessment processes and techniques must be culturally appropriate and appropriate to the oracy, language and literacy capacity of the assessee and the work being performed. |
- Courses
- Units of Competency
Traning
- Adult Education Principles
- Aviation Consultancy
- Competency Mapping
- Course Design
- Customised Training
- Emergency Evacuation Plans
- Escorted Entries
- Gap Analysis
- Job & Competency Profiling
- Mentoring
- Premium Support
- Procedures Development
- Risk Management
- Quality: Continuous Improvement
- Training & Assessment Systems: Evaluation and Analysis
- Training & Assessment System Development
- Training Needs Analysis
Services
Copyright © 2011Risk Response + RescueAll Rights Reserved Terms & Conditions Disclaimer Privacy PolicyImprint

